Table of Contents
The concepts of macroevolution and microevolution are central to discussions in biology. Let’s explore these concepts, examine their scientific and biblical implications, and provide a biblical perspective supported by references from the New King James Version (NKJV) of the Bible.
1. Understanding Macroevolution and Microevolution
Macroevolution
Darwinists believe that all life is genetically related and has descended from a common ancestor. The first birds and the first mammals are believed to have evolved from a reptile; the first reptile is believed to have evolved from an amphibian; the first amphibian is believed to have evolved from a fish; the first fish is believed to have evolved from a lower form of life, and so on, until we go all the way back to the first single-celled organism, which is believed to have evolved from inorganic matter.
The very first single-celled organism did not possess all of the genetic information for a human, so in order for humans to have ultimately evolved from a primitive single-celled organism, a lot of genetic information had to be added along the way. Change resulting from the introduction of new genetic information is macroevolution.
The reason why macroevolution is controversial and remains theoretical is that there is no known way for entirely new genetic information to be added to a genome. Darwinists have been hoping that genetic mutation would provide a mechanism, but so far that has not been the case. No truly useful mutations have ever been observed.
Microevolution
Microevolution refers to varieties within a given type. Change happens within a group, but the descendant is clearly of the same type as the ancestor. This might better be called variation, or adaptation, but the changes are “horizontal” in effect, not “vertical.” Such changes might be accomplished by “natural selection,” in which a trait within the present variety is selected as the best for a given set of conditions, or accomplished by “artificial selection,” such as when dog breeders produce a new breed of dog. Microevolution is an uncontroversial, well-documented, naturally occurring biological phenomenon.
2. Macroevolution: A Theoretical Perspective
While macroevolution is a key component of the modern evolutionary synthesis, it remains a topic of ongoing research and debate. One reason for this is the lack of direct observation of the long-term processes involved. Critics argue that the mechanisms driving macroevolutionary change are not fully understood and that truly useful mutations leading to new functional structures or organs have not been observed.
For example, the Cambrian Explosion, a period in which a wide variety of complex life forms appeared relatively suddenly in the fossil record, is often cited as a challenge to the gradualist model of macroevolution. The rapid appearance of diverse animal phyla with no apparent precursors raises questions about the sufficiency of current evolutionary mechanisms to explain such phenomena.
In 1980 about 150 of the world’s leading evolutionary theorists gathered at the University of Chicago for a conference entitled “Macroevolution.” Their task: “to consider the mechanisms that underlie the origin of species” (Lewin, Science vol. 210, pp. 883-887). “The central question of the Chicago conference was whether the mechanisms underlying microevolution can be extrapolated to explain the phenomena of macroevolution . . . the answer can be given as a clear, No.”
Thus, the scientific observations support the creation tenet that each basic type is separate and distinct from all others, and that while variation is inevitable, macroevolution does not and did not happen.
3. Microevolution: Observable and Widely Accepted
Microevolution, in contrast, is well-documented and widely accepted. Examples of microevolutionary changes include the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria, changes in beak sizes of finches on the Galápagos Islands, and variations in coloration and patterning of moths in response to environmental changes.
These changes are understood to occur within the genetic framework of a species and do not lead to the emergence of new species. Instead, they demonstrate the ability of organisms to adapt to their environments through existing genetic variability and minor genetic modifications.
When Creationists say they don’t believe in evolution, they are not talking about microevolution, they are only referring to macroevolution.
4. The Biblical Perspective on Creation
The Bible provides a framework for understanding the origin and diversity of life that differs from the evolutionary model. According to the biblical account, God created life in distinct “kinds” that reproduce according to their kind. This perspective is derived from the creation narrative in Genesis.
In Genesis 1:24-25 (NKJV), we read:
“Then God said, ‘Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to its kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth, each according to its kind’; and it was so. And God made the beast of the earth according to its kind, cattle according to its kind, and everything that creeps on the earth according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.”
This passage emphasizes the creation of distinct kinds, each reproducing within its own category. This aligns with the concept of microevolution, where variations occur within a given type but do not lead to the emergence of entirely new kinds.
5. Variation Within Kinds: A Biblical Concept
The concept of variation within kinds is supported by observations of microevolution. The Bible acknowledges the ability of organisms to adapt and change within their created kinds. For instance, the story of Jacob and Laban in Genesis 30:32-43 describes selective breeding practices that led to variations in the appearance of livestock.
Genesis 30:37-39 (NKJV) states:
“Now Jacob took for himself rods of green poplar and of the almond and chestnut trees, peeled white strips in them, and exposed the white which was in the rods. And the rods which he had peeled, he set before the flocks in the gutters, in the watering troughs where the flocks came to drink, so that they should conceive when they came to drink. So the flocks conceived before the rods, and the flocks brought forth streaked, speckled, and spotted.”
This account demonstrates an understanding of how selective breeding can lead to variations within a species, consistent with the concept of microevolution.
6. The Limits of Variation
While the Bible supports the idea of variation within kinds, it does not endorse the concept of one kind evolving into a completely different kind (macroevolution). The distinct boundaries between kinds, as described in Genesis, suggest that there are limits to the extent of variation that can occur.
Leviticus 19:19 (NKJV) reinforces the idea of maintaining distinctions between kinds:
“You shall keep My statutes. You shall not let your livestock breed with another kind. You shall not sow your field with mixed seed.”
This verse underscores the importance of preserving the distinctiveness of kinds, reflecting a principle of separation and order in God’s creation.
7. The Role of Mutations
Mutations are often cited as a driving force behind evolutionary change. However, the biblical perspective recognizes that while mutations can lead to variations within a kind, they do not result in the emergence of new kinds. The overall genetic stability and integrity of created kinds are maintained.
James 1:17 (NKJV) highlights the unchanging nature of God’s creation:
“Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and comes down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or shadow of turning.”
This verse underscores the idea that God’s creation, including the kinds He created, is stable and unchanging in its fundamental nature.
8. Biblical Examples of Adaptation
The Bible contains numerous examples of adaptation and variation within kinds, demonstrating the compatibility of microevolution with biblical teaching.
a. Noah’s Ark: The account of Noah’s Ark in Genesis 6-9 suggests that a limited number of animal kinds were preserved and later diversified to fill the earth. This diversification can be seen as an example of microevolution, where variations within kinds led to the wide array of species we observe today.
b. The Tower of Babel: The story of the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11:1-9 describes the diversification of human languages and cultures. This event illustrates how a single human population can diversify into different groups, similar to the way microevolution leads to variations within species.
Genesis 11:9 (NKJV) states:
“Therefore its name is called Babel, because there the Lord confused the language of all the earth; and from there the Lord scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth.”
9. Theological Implications
Understanding the distinction between macroevolution and microevolution has significant theological implications. Accepting microevolution within the framework of biblical kinds allows Christians to appreciate the adaptability and diversity of God’s creation without compromising the integrity of the biblical creation account.
However, the acceptance of macroevolution opposes the Scripture, particularly regarding the origin of species and the historical Adam and Eve. The biblical creation account presents humans as uniquely created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26-27), with a distinct beginning.
Genesis 1:27 (NKJV) states:
“So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.”
This verse affirms the special creation of humans, distinct from other forms of life.
10. Conclusion
In conclusion, the concepts of macroevolution and microevolution offer different perspectives. Macroevolution, involving large-scale changes leading to new kinds, remains theoretical and lacks observational support. Microevolution, involving small-scale variatians within kinds, is well-documented and consistent with the biblical concept of variation within created kinds.
The Bible supports the idea of variation and adaptation within kinds, as seen in the examples of selective breeding and the diversification of human populations. However, it maintains clear distinctions between kinds, emphasizing the stability and integrity of God’s creation.
For Christians, embracing microevolution within the biblical framework allows for a harmonious understanding of scientific observations and scriptural teachings. This perspective acknowledges the adaptability and diversity of life while upholding the special creation of distinct kinds by God.
Ultimately, the biblical perspective calls for a recognition of God’s sovereignty and wisdom in creation, as expressed in Job 12:7-10 (NKJV):
“But now ask the beasts, and they will teach you; and the birds of the air, and they will tell you; or speak to the earth, and it will teach you; and the fish of the sea will explain to you. Who among all these does not know that the hand of the Lord has done this, in whose hand is the life of every living thing, and the breath of all mankind?”
This passage encourages a humble acknowledgment of God’s works, affirming that all creation ultimately points to His order and wisdom.
Check out the Bible Answers page for more information on a variety of topics.
In His service,
BibleAsk Team