Is Moses’ Law a rewording of Hammurabi’s code?

SHARE

By BibleAsk Team


The comparison between Moses’ Law, as given in the Old Testament, and the Code of Hammurabi, an ancient Babylonian legal code, is a topic of historical and scholarly interest. While there are some similarities between the two legal systems, there are also significant differences that distinguish them from one another. In this exploration, we will delve into the nature of Moses’ Law as presented in the Bible, examine the key differences between Moses’ Law and the Code of Hammurabi, and consider the theological implications of these distinctions.

The Nature of Moses’ Law

Moses’ Law, also known as the Mosaic Law or the Law of Moses, refers to the collection of religious and ethical principles, commandments, and regulations given by God to the Israelites through the prophet Moses. These laws are primarily found in the books of Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy in the Old Testament. Moses’ Law encompasses various aspects of Israelite life, including moral conduct, religious observance, social justice, and ritual purity. It is regarded as the foundation of Israelite society and the covenant relationship between God and His chosen people.

Moses’ Law can be categorized into three main components: moral, civil, and ceremonial laws. The moral laws provide ethical guidelines for human conduct and relationships, emphasizing principles such as reverence for God, respect for authority, honesty, integrity, and compassion for others. The civil laws address matters of social justice, governance, and communal life, covering topics such as property rights, criminal justice, marriage and family relations, and economic fairness. The ceremonial laws pertain to religious rituals, sacrifices, and purity regulations aimed at fostering spiritual worship and maintaining the sanctity of the priesthood and the tabernacle.

The Cod of Hammurabi

The Code of Hammurabi was a Babylonian law of ancient Mesopotamia, dating back to about 1754 BC. The sixth Babylonian king, Hammurabi, enacted the code, and partial copies exist on a seven and a half foot stone stele and various clay tablets. Hammurabi claimed to receive his code from the Babylonian god of justice, Shamash.

The code of Hammurabi consists of 282 laws from property rights and criminal behavior to slavery and divorce. It included many bizarre, unfair, and gruesome forms of punishment. And the laws varied according to social class and gender. It clearly favored the free and wealthy over the poor and oppressed. Mercy and fairness were rare. The code had no spiritual element to it and represented a lower view of human life.  For example, the consequence for theft is to repay ten- to thirty-fold. If that’s not possible, the thief was executed.

Differences Between Moses’ Law and the Code of Hammurabi

While Moses’ Law and the Code of Hammurabi share some similarities in their legal content and ethical principles, there are several key differences that distinguish them from one another:

a. Source of Authority: One of the fundamental differences between Moses’ Law and the Code of Hammurabi lies in their respective sources of authority. Moses’ Law was given by God to Moses on Mount Sinai and is thus regarded as divine revelation. The laws are viewed as binding on God’s children as a reflection of the divine will and as the basis of the covenant relationship between God and His people.

In contrast, the Code of Hammurabi was promulgated by the Babylonian king Hammurabi around the 18th century BCE and reflects the secular authority of a human ruler. While both legal codes address issues of justice and social order, their underlying authority differs significantly.

b. Religious and Ethical Framework: Another key difference between Moses’ Law and the Code of Hammurabi lies in their religious and ethical frameworks. Moses’ Law is deeply rooted in monotheistic faith and emphasizes the worship of the one true God, Yahweh. The moral laws reflect the Israelites’ covenantal relationship with God and the ethical principles derived from His character.

In contrast, the Code of Hammurabi reflects the polytheistic religious beliefs of ancient Mesopotamia, where the king was considered the representative of the gods on earth. While both legal codes address issues of morality and justice, their theological underpinnings and ethical emphases differ.

c. Scope and Application: Moses’ Law encompasses a comprehensive range of legal, moral, and religious regulations governing virtually every aspect of Israelite life. The laws are intended to guide individual behavior, regulate social interactions, and govern religious worship within the community of faith. The application of Moses’ Law extends beyond civil and criminal justice to include matters of personal piety, ritual purity, and communal solidarity.

In contrast, the Code of Hammurabi primarily addresses legal matters related to civil law, criminal justice, and economic transactions within ancient Babylonian society. While the Code of Hammurabi is significant as one of the earliest known legal codes, its scope and application are more limited compared to the comprehensive nature of Moses’ Law.

d. Ethical Principles and Human Dignity: Moses’ Law places a strong emphasis on ethical principles such as justice, compassion, and concern for the vulnerable members of society. The laws include provisions for the protection of widows, orphans, foreigners, and the poor, reflecting a concern for social justice and human dignity.

In contrast, while the Code of Hammurabi includes provisions for the protection of certain rights and the punishment of wrongdoing, its emphasis on social hierarchy and the rights of property owners may reflect a more limited conception of human dignity and equality.

4. Theological Implications: The differences between Moses’ Law and the Code of Hammurabi have theological implications for understanding the nature of divine revelation, the character of God, and the ethical foundations of Israelite society. Moses’ Law is seen as a reflection of God’s holiness, justice, and mercy, intended to guide His people in righteous living and to cultivate a community of faith characterized by love for God and neighbor. The laws are understood within the context of God’s covenantal relationship with Israel, where obedience to His commands is rewarded with blessings and disobedience is met with consequences.

In contrast, the Code of Hammurabi, while significant as a historical artifact, is viewed within the context of ancient Near Eastern legal traditions and the secular authority of human rulers. While the code includes provisions for justice and social order, it lacks the transcendent moral authority and theological significance attributed to Moses’ Law. The differences between the two legal codes highlight the unique character of Israelite religion and the distinctiveness of Yahweh as the God of Israel.

Other Laws

Some claim that Moses’ Law is a rewording of Hammurabi’s code but it should be noted that the law of Hammurabi is not the only law beside that of Moses. There are similar law codes, even older than Hammurabi’s, that have been found in various other places. These would include the Cuneiform laws, written as early as 2350 B.C.; the Code of Urukagina, 2380 B.C.; the Code of Ur-Nammu, 2050 B.C.; and Lipit-Ishtar of Isin written two centuries before Hammurabi came to power.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while there are some similarities between Moses’ Law and the Code of Hammurabi in their legal content and ethical principles, there are also significant differences that distinguish them from one another. Moses’ Law is viewed as divine revelation given by God to Moses for the guidance and governance of the Israelite people. The laws reflect the ethical principles derived from God’s character and are intended to foster righteousness, justice, and compassion within the community of faith.

In contrast, the Code of Hammurabi reflects the secular authority of a human ruler and the legal traditions of ancient Mesopotamia. While both legal codes address issues of justice and social order, their theological underpinnings, sources of authority, and ethical emphases differ significantly.

In His service,
BibleAsk Team

We'd love your feedback, so leave a comment!

If you feel an answer is not 100% Bible based, then leave a comment, and we'll be sure to review it.
Our aim is to share the Word and be true to it.