Quick Answer
God killed Onan because he disobeyed God’s command regarding his duty to his deceased brother’s widow, Tamar. In Genesis 38, Onan was instructed to fulfill the levirate marriage obligation, which involved providing offspring for his brother. Instead, Onan acted selfishly and refused to complete this duty, leading to his punishment. This story illustrates God’s values of righteousness, faithfulness, and covenant loyalty, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling one’s responsibilities within God’s plan.
Judah, Onan, Tamar, and the Meaning of Genesis 38
The story of Judah, Onan, and Tamar in Genesis 38 is one of the most misunderstood narratives in Scripture. Many people wonder why God killed Onan, why Tamar disguised herself, and why Judah declared that Tamar was more righteous than he. When examined carefully, the story reveals deep lessons about sin, justice, responsibility, and the grace of God. It also shows how God worked through imperfect people to fulfill His covenant promises and preserve the line of the Messiah.
Genesis 38 teaches that God values righteousness, faithfulness, and covenant loyalty. It highlights the ancient custom of levirate marriage, the failures of Judah’s family, and the surprising faith of Tamar, a woman who chose God above her own people. Her story becomes part of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, showing how God redeems even broken and complicated situations for His glory.
The Sin of Er and Onan
Genesis 38 begins by introducing Judah’s firstborn son, Er. The Bible says simply and clearly that Er was wicked in the sight of the Lord, and the Lord slew him. Although Scripture does not list the details of Er’s sins, it shows that God judged him instantly for his evil character. His death left Tamar, his wife, childless.
According to the custom of the time, Judah instructed his second son, Onan, to marry Tamar and raise up offspring for his brother. This custom, known as levirate marriage, ensured that the name, family inheritance, and lineage of the dead brother would continue. Onan was required to act in his brother’s place and provide Tamar with a child who would become the heir of Er.
Onan, however, refused to fulfill this duty. Scripture explains that when he went in to his brother’s wife, he spilled his seed on the ground because he knew the child would not be counted as his. Onan did not want to raise up an heir who would receive Er’s inheritance. He wanted the material benefits for himself.
This was not simply a sexual sin. Onan’s refusal was a deliberate act of selfishness, greed, and rebellion against a sacred family duty. He used Tamar for his own pleasure while denying her the child that was rightfully hers. This showed a heart that cared neither for his brother, nor Tamar, nor God’s covenant family structure. His behavior dishonored marriage, disrespected his family, and violated the customs that reflected God’s plan for preserving the chosen line.
The Bible says that this act displeased the Lord. Therefore, the Lord killed him also. God judged Onan for the same reason He judged Er, because his conduct was wicked in His sight.
The Meaning of Levirate Marriage
The custom of levirate marriage appears first in Genesis 38 but was later included in the Law of Moses. The word levir comes from the Latin word meaning brother-in-law. In Deuteronomy 25:5 and 6, the law says that if a man dies childless, his brother should take the widow as his wife and raise up offspring for him. The firstborn son of such a union would succeed in the name of the dead brother so his name would not be lost from Israel.
This practice helped protect widows, preserve inheritance rights, and maintain family lines. It also served to keep God’s covenant promises alive within the tribes of Israel. The levirate marriage was not immoral. It was a sacred responsibility that showed loyalty and love toward one’s family.
Many ancient cultures practiced similar customs, including the Hittites and Assyrians. In some traditions, if there was no living brother, the father of the deceased could perform the duty to preserve the family name. This background is important for understanding Tamar’s later actions.
Tamar, Judah, and the Failure of Responsibility
After Onan’s death, Judah promised Tamar that she would eventually marry his youngest son, Shelah, when he grew up. But Judah did not intend to keep this promise. He feared that Shelah would also die, just as his brothers had. Instead of acknowledging the wickedness of his sons, Judah blamed Tamar and believed she was the cause of their deaths.
Judah then sent Tamar back to her father’s house, essentially abandoning her and condemning her to a life of childless widowhood. This was unjust and cruel. Tamar had fulfilled every duty required of her, yet she was left without support, without a husband, and without hope of children.
As time passed and Shelah became grown, Judah still refused to give Tamar to him. Judah broke his promise, violated cultural expectations, and endangered Tamar’s future.
Tamar’s Plan to Have Children
Tamar realized that Judah would never fulfill his obligation. According to the customs of the Hittites and Assyrians, if no brother could perform levirate marriage, the father of the deceased could assume the responsibility. Tamar chose to claim the right that Judah had refused to give her.
When Tamar heard that Judah was traveling to Timnath, she devised a plan. She removed her widow’s clothing, veiled herself, and sat in a place where Judah would pass. Judah, not recognizing her, believed she was a harlot and offered a young goat in exchange for intimacy. Tamar requested a pledge until he paid: Judah’s signet, bracelet, and staff. These items were unmistakable personal identifiers.
Judah agreed and went in to her. Tamar conceived. She asked for nothing more than what was rightfully hers: a child who would continue the family line.
Three months later, when Judah learned that Tamar was pregnant, he angrily commanded that she be burned. But Tamar sent him the signet, bracelet, and staff and said, The man who owns these made me pregnant. Judah recognized his guilt and declared, She has been more righteous than I, because I did not give her to my son Shelah.
Judah finally acknowledged that Tamar’s actions were justified in light of his broken promise. He recognized that he had wronged her, not the other way around. He also did not lie with her again, showing that the act was not an ongoing relationship but a single event grounded in the levirate custom.
God’s Blessing on Tamar
God saw Tamar’s faith and honored her desire to be part of His people. Tamar could have returned to her Canaanite family after Er and Onan died, but she chose instead to cling to the covenant family of Judah. She valued God’s promises more than comfort, culture, or convenience. She sought to continue the household of Judah even at personal risk.
God rewarded her faithfulness by giving her not one son, but twins. Genesis 38:27 to 30 records the birth of Pharez and Zarah. Tamar became one of the four gentlewomen mentioned in the genealogy of Jesus Christ in Matthew 1. Along with Rahab and Ruth, Tamar was a foreigner who chose God above her people and was honored by becoming part of the messianic lineage.
Tamar shows that God values those who seek righteousness, even when surrounded by injustice or unbelief. Her faith shines as a testimony that God can bring His purposes to pass in unexpected ways through unexpected people.
Final Thoughts
The story of Judah, Onan, and Tamar teaches that God judges wickedness, values righteousness, and honors covenant faithfulness. Er and Onan were judged because their actions were evil in God’s sight. Judah failed to uphold his responsibilities, but Tamar acted courageously to claim the right the family owed her. Through her determination and faith, God preserved the family line that would eventually lead to the Messiah.
Tamar’s story reminds believers that God works through imperfect situations to fulfill His promises. He honors those who seek Him, even when circumstances appear hopeless. Genesis 38 is not merely a story of sin and failure but a story of God’s grace woven through human brokenness.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this article — share your thoughts above and start the discussion.