Does the Bible say Peter went to Rome?


By BibleAsk Team

The question of whether the Bible explicitly states that the apostle Peter went to Rome is a topic of historical speculation within Christian scholarship. While the New Testament contains references to Peter’s activities and travels, it does not provide definitive evidence regarding his presence in Rome. However, several passages and traditions have led to the belief that Peter eventually journeyed to the capital city of the Roman Empire. Exploring these references and considering historical context can offer insight into this question.

Peter’s Ministry in the New Testament

The New Testament provides accounts of Peter’s activities primarily in the Gospels and the Book of Acts. Peter, also known as Simon or Cephas, was one of the twelve disciples chosen by Jesus and played a prominent role in the early Christian community. He is depicted as a key figure in the spread of the Gospel, particularly among the Jewish population.

Peter’s Letters and Their Implications

Two letters in the New Testament are attributed to Peter: First Peter and Second Peter. While these letters do not contain explicit references to Peter’s presence in Rome, they address recipients who are described as residing in various regions, including Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia (1 Peter 1:1). The absence of a specific mention of Rome in Peter’s letters does not necessarily rule out the possibility of his presence there, as he could have addressed different audiences at different times.


While tradition suggests that Peter met his violent death at Rome, there is no reference in the Bible for that except one speculation that is found in 1 Peter 5:13 as the name “Babylon” suggests. The clause in that verse reads literally, “She who is in Babylon, elect together with you, greets you…” And since there is no historical evidence that supports the idea that Peter ever ministered in literal Babylon, we can conclude that Peter was referring to Rome in his letter.

It is a known fact that the early Christians often used the title “Babylon” to refer to the Roman capital, to avoid political punishments. The apostle John shows that in the following verse: “And another angel followed, saying, “Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she has made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication” (Revelation 14:8).

Bible commentators agree that Peter in his first epistle 5:13 used the term Babylon as a covered reference to Rome. Some believe that the apostle Peter went to Rome towards the end of his life. And his first epistle displays the existence of an unfriendly attitude toward Christians there.

For he wrote: “Beloved, do not think it strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened to you;  but rejoice to the extent that you partake of Christ’s sufferings, that when His glory is revealed, you may also be glad with exceeding joy.  If you are reproached for the name of Christ, blessed are you, for the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. On their part He is blasphemed, but on your part He is glorified” (1 Peter 4:12–15; also 2:12 ).

This may suggest the time of Nero’s persecution, which began in A.D. 64. Also, the fact that there is no reference to Peter’s presence in Rome in Paul’s letters suggests that Peter did not arrive to Rome until “about the time of Paul’s final arrest,” which was about A.D. 66.

Historical Context

The historical context of the early Christian movement and the expansion of the Roman Empire provide additional insights into the plausibility of Peter’s presence in Rome. During the first century CE, Rome served as the political, cultural, and religious center of the Mediterranean world. It was a hub of commerce, communication, and diverse religious beliefs. The presence of a significant Jewish population in Rome, along with the growing influence of Christianity, would have made it a strategic location for early Christian leaders to visit and establish communities.


While the Bible does not explicitly state that Peter went to Rome, the belief in his presence there is supported by extra-biblical traditions, early Christian writings, and historical context. The Petrine tradition, combined with references from early Christian figures and the significance of Rome in the ancient world, has contributed to the widespread acceptance of Peter’s association with Rome within Christian tradition. However, the question remains a subject of scholarly inquiry and debate, and definitive evidence from the biblical text is lacking.

In His service,
BibleAsk Team

Leave a Reply

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments