Are the historical statements of the Bible accurate?


By BibleAsk Team

Archaeological Discoveries and the Bible

The Bible historical statements are accurate. Sometimes, temporarily, evidence may not be found to substantiate certain historical facts from the Scriptures, but with the passing of time the evidence appears. Recent archaeological discoveries proved the authenticity of Bible characters, cities and events. Here are some facts:

The Dead Sea Scrolls, discovered in 1948 and date back to 150-170 BC, contained all or parts of the Old Testament books except the book of Esther.

The Cyrus Cylinder, discovered in 1879, records Cyrus’ overthrow of Babylon and his subsequent deliverance of the Jewish captives (Isaiah 45; 2 Chronicles 36; Ezra 1).

The Rosetta Stone, discovered in 1799 in Egypt by Napoleon’s scientists, was written in three languages: hieroglyphics, demotic, and Greek. It unlocked the mystery of the hieroglyphics which have helped confirm the authenticity of the Bible.

The Moabite Stone, discovered in 1868 at Dibon, Jordan, confirmed Moabite attacks on Israel as recorded in (2 Kings 1 and 3).

The Lachish Letters, discovered in 1932-1938, 24 miles north of Beersheba, described the attack of Nebuchadnezzar on Jerusalem in 586 BC (2 kings 25:1).

Bible Historical Statements Are Accurate

Archaeological discoveries have proved many details of the Bible that had been scoffed at by critics:

  1. Skeptics said the Bible record of Moses was not reliable because it mentions writing (Exodus 24:4) and wheeled vehicles (Exodus 14:25), neither of which they said existed at the time. Recent discoveries in the Red sea proved the reliability of the Biblical story of Moses.
  2. The ancient city of Petra (in the heart of Mount Seir) was virtually unknown to archaeologists, with only the Bible to give account of its existence (Ezekiel 35:7). But 200 years ago all of that changed when the Swiss explorer Johann Burckhardt made the famous discovery of that city.
  3. For years skeptics said the Bible was unreliable because it recorded the Hittite nation (Deuteronomy 7:1) and cities like Nineveh (Jonah 1:1, 2) and Sodom (Genesis 19:1), which they denied ever existed. But now modern archaeology has confirmed that all three cities did exist.
  4. Critics also said that Bible-mentioned kings Belshazzar (Daniel 5:1) and Sargon (Isaiah 20:1) never existed. It has now been confirmed that they did exist.
  5. At one time, the thirty nine kings of ancient Israel and Judah who ruled during the divided kingdom were verified only from the Bible record, so critics charged fabrication. But then archaeologists found cuneiform records that mentioned many of these kings.
  6. A Biblical prophecy correctly foretold the destruction of the ancient city of Tyre (Ezekiel 26:3-5).
  7. Babylon was excavated in 1898. The archaeological findings point to the truth of Scripture’s prophecies about that great city (Isaiah 13:19-22).

All this show that the Bible historical statements are accurate and true.

In His service,
BibleAsk Team

We'd love your feedback, so leave a comment!

If you feel an answer is not 100% Bible based, then leave a comment, and we'll be sure to review it.
Our aim is to share the Word and be true to it.